BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Kashiv P, Balwani MR, Pasari A, Saxena K, Kute VB. Trimethylamine N-oxide as a key microbial mediator in the progression of diabetic kidney disease. World J Nephrol 2026; 15(2): 117355 [DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v15.i2.117355]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We are highly satisfied with the overall editorial and publication process. The online submission system was user-friendly, the peer-review process was timely, fair, and constructive, and the reviewers' comments substantially improved the quality of our manuscript. The editorial team provided excellent support throughout the publication process, and the copy-editing quality was outstanding without affecting the scientific integrity of the work. The final PDF, online full-text article, figures, and tables were prepared accurately and professionally. We appreciate the journal's commitment to maintaining high academic and ethical standards and thank the editorial office, reviewers, and production team for their valuable efforts.